Friday, March 3, 2017

Newspaper Ethos

Ethos is another rhetorical device used to get people to read this news article. The title alone appeals to ethos. The title states that the President signed the bill which makes the signing of the bill more official. The article references other leads in America as well to establish more credibility. Mentioning the House having a long debate makes the bill passing worth the wait. The people in the House are elected to make legislative decisions, so it can be argued that since they are granted the right to vote on the passing of laws then their decisions have value. The article to the right by Laurence Stern begins with addressing congressional, religious, and civil rights leaders. These were people who helped fought for civil rights and they were gathered at the white house to see the signing as well. Having the image of those people there at the signing makes the signing more personable for those who wanted the bill to past. All of the experienced people that were previously mentioned make the passing of the bill more official and remarkable.

3 comments:

  1. Your analysis of the ethos in this article is very good! It would be interesting to know which newspaper this article came from. This could give up more background information about the organization's extrinsic ethos so that we can evaluate if there are possible biases.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you that the newspaper article's title, "President...," is reflective of the authority and credibility of the discussed piece of history, or the passing of the Civil Rights Bill. Although, I am curious to see who the publisher of the newspaper is as that will bring into debate a different sort of ethos/credibility. We trust the ethos of the President (in his act) but do we trust the ethos of the newspaper (in their reporting of the act?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The references made by the author of this text bring about a high level of ethos to its Readers. However this particular invocation of our president is a very shaky form of ethos. People who's views do not aline with him would be affected in the opposite way

    ReplyDelete